Comment by π² gonzosnose
Re: "Gemini trademark conflict"
It's frustrating having to dig a little to find the actual gemini protocol specifications, but I guess nothing can be done. Even if Google's Gemini dies it'll still be clogging search results for ages.
Aug 27 Β· 7 weeks ago
Poll Results
1. Ignore it
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ 77%
2. Contact Google and fight it (Gemini *DID* pre-date Google's Gemini)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ 12%
3. Rebrand gemini to something else?
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ 11%
91 votes were cast.
4 Later Comments β
π pista Β· Aug 27 at 13:37:
First two google results for βgemini internet protocolβ (without quotes) just now are:
1. Wikipedia article about us
2. Gemini Quickstart (https://geminiquickst.art) which tells how to get a gemini browser and get into gemini space.
Thatβs pretty darn good.
If you want to compete for just the word βgeminiβ you are literally fighting the stars.
πΊ kallisti5 [OP] Β· Sep 05 at 15:06:
@pista yeah, it's still reasonably easy to find gemini if you add on the correct search modifiers. It *is* however getting more difficult to find as Google's Gemini takes off.
π omorrigan Β· Oct 07 at 03:26:
the advocates for the protocol should be clear on the talks, we are taltkin about Gemini Protocol and not the Google dogfood
π stack Β· Oct 07 at 13:21:
Would you please lock this nonsensical thread
Original Post
Gemini trademark conflict β Anyone else notice that Google is using the Gemini branding for their AI crap? It's taking over the search results for gemini. Getting harder and harder to find things Gemini-related without stumbling over Google's AI rubbish. What should Gemini do?
π¬ kallisti5 Β· 66 comments Β· Aug 07 Β· 2 months ago Β· π³οΈ
Source