Comment by ๐ decant
Re: "Which Javascript-free Browser?"
I would use netsurf, but on unix it requires GTK which is a boatload of deps. dillo has buildin uMatrix function that let you block third party elements on a per site basis, and you can change useragent easily. On netsurf, you just can't do that. Is there a netsurf port for OpenBSD that can do these?? Open for suggestions.
Feb 02 ยท 5 months ago
Poll Results
1. Dillo
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ 24%
2. Links2
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ 24%
3. Mosaic
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ 0%
4. Other? (Specify below)
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ 53%
34 votes were cast.
7 Later Comments โ
๐ decant ยท Feb 02 at 16:43:
more of a uMatrix like function, there is no easily point and click interface, you need to edit /.dillo/domainrc
๐ Alfika07 ยท Apr 04 at 20:58:
Netsurf is very lightweit and it's used on RISCOS by default
๐ norayr ยท Apr 05 at 00:50:
i noticed nobody mentioned lynx. i remember it didn't support html frames, unlike links, but it could convert some non unicode language encodings to translit.
dillo for linux when needed, mothra for 9front/plan9, gemini almost everywhere <3
๐ norayr ยท Apr 05 at 10:35:
actually yes, lagrange or amfora + levior or duckling proxy is more than you need for most websites.
Not sure if that's the answer, but I've simply set `javascript.enabled` to `false` in the `Firefox about:config`
๐ pista ยท Apr 05 at 18:11:
@byte based.
Original Post
Which Javascript-free Browser? โ Which Javascript-free and/or text-based light browser do people prefer? Sometimes it's nice to view the web through a more simple lens, even though it breaks 98% of websites out there. Are you more of a Dillo-head, or a traditionalist hanging out at the TTY with Links2? Or are you a *true* traditionalist and go all the way back with Mosaic? Maybe something else? Actually, pruning my daily www usage to websites which work well in these "simple" browsers has...
๐ฌ 25 comments ยท 3 likes ยท Jan 22 ยท 5 months ago ยท ๐ณ๏ธ
Source